4 ms·
I dream (awake!) of The World seeing that date, thinking something along the lines of "but hey, that's annoying, I'm not sure which date that refers to!" and th
by unwind 14y ago
I dream (awake!) of The World seeing that date, thinking something along the lines of "but hey, that's annoying, I'm not sure which date that refers to!" and then just adopting ISO 8601 immediately.
- przemoc 14y agoSometimes I'm really baffled by the dominance of American date formats instead of clear, natural and sortable ISO 8601. YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS.ffffff+ZZZZ
- dasil003 14y agoI used to think the same way until I moved to the UK and people expressed the opinion that YYYY-MM-DD is still an American format. I guess because for them the day always comes before month. Nevertheless, ISO 8601 is clearly the ideal format for its sortability and consistency, cultural imperialism be damned!
- przemoc 14y agoWell, in Poland we do use D.[M]M.[YY]YY too, which is unfortunately quite popular, as a short version of the format with verbal month "D MMMMM YYYY r." (r. stands for "rok[u]", i.e. year). This long version is predominantly used in lots of official forms and letters here.
- btilly 14y agoHeh. At a previous job I advocated that format so much that people thought it was a Canadian format. They were quite surprised when I told them the actual format that was used in Canada.
- stordoff 14y agoFor anything handwritten (cheques, dates on signatures etc.), I use YYYY-Mmm-DD (e.g. 2012-Jan-10), as I can't imagine anyone confusing the meaning of it. I avoid DD-MM-YYYY and MM-DD-YYYY, as I usually end up having to check what I meant. No one has commented on it yet. Typed, I use YYYY-MM-DD (e.g. 2012-01-10), mainly for its sortability.