> Great. It's a modern day equivalent of the lie detector for recordings. Unless it's a lot more reliable than the polygraph, it shouldn't be admissible in cou

> Great. It's a modern day equivalent of the lie detector for recordings. Unless it's a lot more reliable than the polygraph, it shouldn't be admissible in court, either. (The polygraph, sometimes called a 'lie detector', does not create evidence admissible in court. It has too many false positives and false negatives.) http://antipolygraph.org/ http://antipolygraph.org/ http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2012/09/25/nsa-whistleblower-reveals-how-to-beat-a-polygraph-test http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2012/09... http://www.skepdic.com/polygrap.html http://www.skepdic.com/polygrap.html