3 ms·
Today's state-of-the-art AI systems are the equivalent of late 1970s personal computers: bulky and expensive, but wildly more powerful than what came before. An
by kmoser 2mo ago
Today's state-of-the-art AI systems are the equivalent of late 1970s personal computers: bulky and expensive, but wildly more powerful than what came before. And look what happened: tech improved by orders of magnitude, and eventually computers were tiny and cheap.
I predict the same will happen with AI: certainly the latest and greatest will still command a steep price (yes, supercomputers are still a thing) but for most people who just need something reasonably fast and powerful, cheap (or free) AI will do the trick, especially when run locally.
So no, the aristocracy won't have a lock on the technology because tech is always being democratized. Until arbitrary computation itself is outlawed (and yes, I know, governments and industry are always inching us closer to that), we'll be ok.
- AndrewOMartin 2mo ago1970s personal computers were "controlled" by the likes of Richard Stallman. 2020s AI systems are controlled by the likes of Sam Altman. See the difference? This is intentionally a wild and crude oversimplification, but I hope to raise at least one point against the notion that AI will be similarly democratized.
- kmoser 2mo ago> 1970s personal computers were "controlled" by the likes of Richard Stallman. Who are you talking about? Richard Stallman is all about allowing anybody to freely run their own software on their own hardware.