4 ms·
Then actually state the specific costs and disadvantages when you respond if you have even a shred of interest in contributing anything remotely informative, so
by handedness 2mo ago
Then actually state the specific costs and disadvantages when you respond if you have even a shred of interest in contributing anything remotely informative, so you're actually adding to the discussion versus consistently adding little more than noise.
Otherwise, you're just conducting a years-long, nearly endless amount of low-effort, shallow shilling of a commercial product here, as if it's the simple and pat answer to nearly every question asked, no matter how tangential or unviable, or more charitably, how particular a use case it serves.
Someone could complain about their 60 mile commute by car, and you'd say, "I really enjoy walking two blocks to work, you should buy these shoes," add nothing more, and then move on to do it to others several more times that day.
In a way it would almost be sad if you aren't getting paid by them to do this, because it's all so incredibly...measly.
- fsflover 2mo ago> Then actually state the specific costs and disadvantages Some of those are quite obvious and others are very subtle, so explaining everything is a waste of time. I do reply when someone asks additional questions. > as if it's the simple and pat answer to nearly every question asked I already mentioned to you earlier that this is not true and I comment whenever someone cares about the freedom of computing. > In a way it would almost be sad if you aren't getting paid by them to do this, because it's all so incredibly...measly Would you say the same about my years-long shilling of Qubes OS, too?