4 ms·
I'm going pretty deep on Lisp on accident - can anybody give me more context on this?
by sroerick 2mo ago
I'm going pretty deep on Lisp on accident - can anybody give me more context on this?
- wild_egg 2mo agomore context beyond the changelog? what would you like to know?
- hermitShell 2mo agoYou might find this interesting: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43636230 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43636230
- DonHopkins 2mo ago(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((
- dapperdrake 2mo ago#|))))
- WalterGR 2mo agoThat’s Scheme, not Common Lisp. I’d recommend using close parens for your code sample. Those are portable between the two.
- tmtvl 2mo agoIn Common Lisp it'd be: (funcall (funcall (funcall (funcall ; ... ...though I don't think that functions which return functions which return functions which return functions ad infinitum are a great idea. Simply taking a value and returning a value means you can use a pipelining operator: (~> some-data function-1 function-2 (function-3 _ some-other-data) ; ... function-n)
- vindarel 2mo agoUse `C-c C-]` (`slime-close-all-parens-in-sexp`) in SLIME ;)