3 ms·
I mean, if it's possible to configure and there is at all a reason for someone to configure it as such, then it makes the most sense to treat it as a very valid
by intrikate 2mo ago
I mean, if it's possible to configure and there is at all a reason for someone to configure it as such, then it makes the most sense to treat it as a very valid possibility, right?
- gruez 2mo agoHindsight is 20/20 right? Sure, the duress pin feature was around for years, but so was the technology to set up a thermite boobytrap in a safe. Maybe now CBP officers should be more careful about entering random pins people gave them, but snarky remarks like "Maybe digital forensics shouldn't be handled by barely highschool graduates at a busy border crossing" are entirely unjustified.
- skullone 2mo agoIt is not snarky, it's the truth. Suspending the constitution within 100 miles of every port of entry? Nah son, the government can conduct their petty investigations with a warrant and proper digital forensics if they want to search your property.
- gruez 2mo ago>Nah son, the government can conduct their petty investigations with a warrant Your original post: >Maybe digital forensics shouldn't be handled by barely highschool graduates at a busy border crossing Sounds like you're moving the goalposts from "haha CBP agents are dumb" to "they should get warrants".
- skullone 2mo agoBoth can be true!