3 ms·
> Maybe if they taxed NW >100 million, you wouldn’t need a 50% tax on work. Don't be mistaken, it's an "in addition to" tax, not "instead of", or else it would
by xienze 3mo ago
> Maybe if they taxed NW >100 million, you wouldn’t need a 50% tax on work.
Don't be mistaken, it's an "in addition to" tax, not "instead of", or else it wouldn't be pitched as one of many ways to plug a budget hole.
- bigbadfeline 3mo agoAny "addition to tax" should still be a tax.