3 ms·
The thing about this that's so distasteful is that it removes the basis of enfranchisement from being the inherent worth of a human life and moves it more to "w
by taybin 2mo ago
The thing about this that's so distasteful is that it removes the basis of enfranchisement from being the inherent worth of a human life and moves it more to "what have you done for me lately". It's pretty gross.
- mrwh 2mo agoI don't know why you're being downvoted, gross is exactly the word for it.
- 0xy 2mo agoThere's numerous examples of commune societies evicting people who refuse to contribute. The distasteful thing is people refusing to contribute to society, especially for long periods of time. I know many people who have various mental and physical disabilities (some severe) who insist on working. Some able-bodied people can't even match some with severe disabilities. It's sick.
- taybin 2mo agoYes, that is also gross.
- lorecore 2mo agoWorking a McJob to make some CEO and their investors rich is not a virtue. The Protestant work ethic really is a toxic ideology that can't die soon enough. It's the very basis of exploitation.
- 0xy 2mo agoWhen you choose to not work as an able-bodied person you're really insisting that your community should be forced to give you resources while you contribute nothing. Any collectivist commune would kick you out for this. It's also interesting you use the McJob angle, because when you consider the price of a Big Mac, labor is by far the largest contributor of cost, not profit. A Big Mac's cost is 30% labor, 25% ingredients and only 5% net profit. The remainder is operating costs. Seems like a pretty good deal for the people making the Big Mac, they're getting 6x more than the franchisee gets.
- pavel_lishin 2mo agoIt also lets my manager decide whether I get to vote or not.