3 ms·
Frontier models like Opus 5 are also extremely good a "research" in an academic sense, including combining elements from different fields or literatures and cre
by drnick1 3mo ago
Frontier models like Opus 5 are also extremely good a "research" in an academic sense, including combining elements from different fields or literatures and creating something quite novel sometimes, publishable even, from vague/speculative prompts. This is on top of implementing known methods in about 1/100th of the time it would take by hand, allowing for fast exploration of ideas. They can also roll things out from scratch, removing essentially all third party dependencies from your code base, other than Numpy or Scipy. This really buys you a lot of clarity and/or performance sometimes.
- majormajor 3mo agoYeah, the top-end models still feel better at synthesizing and especially simplifying design. Any of the current GPT-5.6 models can overengineer their way around edge cases. Figuring out how to get the same thing without the overengineering and the often-performance-overhead is harder and something that seems to be still more limited to the bigger models. But even the top-end models tend to overdo it first, then only note that it could've been a fifth the code with twice the perf if you push on it to make it realize that some of those edge cases or situations aren't actually relevant to this particular code. But the situations where you need that are narrowing every release. The "Composer 1" era of low-end models is pretty far away now.
- wuschel 3mo agoInteresting and very curious what you manage to verify and produce with it. What kind of fields are we talking about here? Compsci? EEng? BioChem?
- drnick1 3mo agoScientific computing/statistics.