4 ms·
Did you miss he received the therapy under medical supervision and Netflix’s attorney flat out admitted “the ketamine therapy issue has factored into the termin
by hack1312 2mo ago
Did you miss he received the therapy under medical supervision and Netflix’s attorney flat out admitted “the ketamine therapy issue has factored into the termination”.
- ribosometronome 2mo agoDid you miss that that's according to the one sided exceprt from a lawsuit an ex-employee filed?
- tomnipotent 2mo agoDid you miss that a company attorney acknowledged "the ketamine therapy issue has factored into the termination?"
- ribosometronome 2mo agoOnly according to the lawsuit filed by the fired party.
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- hack1312 2mo agoI notice you’re not calling them a liar.
- ribosometronome 2mo agoI've no idea what happened. Treating allegations in a lawsuit as undeniable true or "flat out admissions" is a bad idea, though. Doing that would have you believing that Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto, after all, he claimed in a lawsuit he is.
- hack1312 2mo agoDo you think the fired employee’s lawyer would have included it if they couldn’t prove it?
- ribosometronome 2mo agoAre you under the impression that lawyers have never included things that later turned out to be false or unprovable in their initial filing of a lawsuit? If lawyers are so infallible, why would one have openly admitted to firing someone for a legal medical treatment they received? I think that, per the parent who you initially replied to's point, that taking a tabloid's clickbait excerpts from one-side of a lawsuit is a terrible way of understanding the truth of a dispute.
- watwut 2mo agoYes, that actually happens in real lawsuits. It is not even rare.