4 ms·
>To everyone here pushing for total proliferation of ... ...general-purpose computers ...unbreakable encryption ...unbackdoored communication ...unkillswitc
by vitalyan8184 2mo ago
>To everyone here pushing for total proliferation of ...
...general-purpose computers
...unbreakable encryption
...unbackdoored communication
...unkillswitched vehicles
...unsurveiled dwellings
>what should be done about ...?
nothing
>Do you seriously want this level of capabilities to be generally available with no guardrails?
yes
- jackdeansmith 2mo agoWhat about uranium enrichment?
- vitalyan8184 2mo ago[dead]
- jackdeansmith 2mo agoI think it would be entirely reasonable to ban death stars in private hands, the same way I think it's entirely reasonable to ban uranium enrichment in private hands. My point is that it's a question of fact about how risky an AI model can be. I think it's clear that current models are not enriched uranium or death star level, but I don't think there's anything ruling it out in the near future!
- jjfoooo4 2mo agoRequires some pretty tough to get raw materials and equipment, to say the least
- davrosthedalek 2mo agoBecause of regulation, not because they are intrinsically hard to get.