3 ms·
A plea from all those who try and understand which acronym is being used - we will not think less of you if you use Mbits/sec and MBytes/sec - and I suspect the
by ghshephard 14y ago
A plea from all those who try and understand which acronym is being used - we will not think less of you if you use Mbits/sec and MBytes/sec - and I suspect the rate of confusion will be somewhat reduced.
(There are those who aren't aware that Mbits/second is the "SI" sense of "Mega, and think that there are not 1048576 bits/second in a Mbit/second, but, we'll leave that for another day)
- Firehed 14y ago> (There are those who aren't aware that Mbits/second is the "SI" sense of "Mega, and think that there are not 1048576 bits/second in a Mbit/second, but, we'll leave that for another day) To be fair, that 2.4% KB/KiB delta isn't terribly interesting until it's into the "giga" or "tera" prefixes (where it compounds to 10-12%). Given you see way more than that in bandwidth fluctuation anyway, it's even less relevant. Plus we always measure our files in byte-suffixed units rather than -bit, which increases the confusion by a factor of 8. That's how I "lost" half a terabyte in my NAS :( Knew that going in, but that's still a crazy amount of storage to apparently disappear due to a naming convention.