3 ms·
> I question what is the value or helpfulness of continuing to doubt scientifically proven facts. And I question why you believe that anyone here did doubt the
by zahlman 3mo ago
> I question what is the value or helpfulness of continuing to doubt scientifically proven facts.
And I question why you believe that anyone here did doubt them.
> I consider dismissing widely accepted scientific results using words like "simple-minded" as pretty much the definition of snark.... In what world is calling climate attribution "simple-minded" not snark?
That is not what happened. The term "simple-minded" was not used to describe "scientific results" of any kind, nor the underlying scientific theory, nor any scientist involved. It was used to describe someone who carelessly started the fire.
- moritzwarhier 3mo agoOof. that's on me then, because I did read the parts about people making fires and smoking in the forests, but still misread this. I'll leave the rest of what I wrote as it is.