Something which is functional but lacking polish trumps something that is extremely polished but doesn't do much. Putting it another way, which Minimum Viable

Something which is functional but lacking polish trumps something that is extremely polished but doesn't do much. Putting it another way, which Minimum Viable Date would you choose? 1. Cute and sociable. Smells nice, good conversationalist. Date involves picking up two packages of cup-a-soup from 7-11 and sitting on the curb outside. 2. Heroin addicted, hasn't showered in a week. Withdrawn from conversation. Date involves dinner and wine at a Michelin- starred restaurant followed by a limo picking you up and taking you to a sold-out concert where you're in the front row and you have backstage passes after. Make sure you understand which is the feature and which is the polish. The feature in the above two examples is the person. That's what the date is really about. The polish is where you go and what you do with the person. This is what Apple got wrong with their maps app. Its appearance is what you'd expect from Apple. It's really polished and likely went through their rigorous pixel-perfect prototyping [0]. But the underlying feature that people expect is accurate mapping. Having a map which is never wrong but looks like an Etch-a-Sketch would be preferable to a highly polished map which gets you stranded in the Australian Outback. That said, you want to find the right balance. If you're providing the app to existing customers, they're probably looking for the functionality and can deal with a lack of polish. If you're using the app as a marketing tool to attract customers, be sure to make it look good but they may not sign up if the functionality isn't there. [0] http://intenseminimalism.com/2011/apple-design-myths-a-summary/ http://intenseminimalism.com/2011/apple-design-myths-a-summa...