4 ms·
This page [0] didn't read as very AI-generated to me. However, it had an interesting link: > within days of closing a Cornell partner on the new board emailed
by vintagedave 3mo ago
This page [0] didn't read as very AI-generated to me. However, it had an interesting link:
> within days of closing a Cornell partner on the new board emailed the CEO to ask, "Is there fraud going on???"
(Italicised part is the link) linking to [1].
When I search that page, I cannot find the word 'fraud' let alone anything like that quote.
It's highly suspicious when a linked claim does not support the claim.
[0]: https://www.worseonpurpose.com/p/your-cookware-got-worse-on-purpose https://www.worseonpurpose.com/p/your-cookware-got-worse-on-...
[1]: https://fortune.com/2024/11/19/crock-pot-explosion-cornell-capital-goldman-sachs-private-equity-mergers-personal-injury-lawsuit/?utm_campaign=your-cookware-got-worse-on-purpose&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=www.worseonpurpose.com https://fortune.com/2024/11/19/crock-pot-explosion-cornell-c...
- burkaman 3mo agoThat probably comes from this article: https://www.mckoolsmith.com/assets/htmldocuments/2024%2011%2017%20How%20Instant%20Brands%20Went%20From%20Victim%20to%20Accused%20According%20to%20Bankruptcy%20Trustee.pdf https://www.mckoolsmith.com/assets/htmldocuments/2024%2011%2.... Could be a copy/paste error, or could be an LLM trying to cite its own work by just looking at a list of sources used and guessing which one the claim came from.