4 ms·
I looked into it a bit more, and while it does look helpful in the first glance, it actually isn't a good fit for code. It's very aviation-terminology-focused.
by artogahr 2mo ago
I looked into it a bit more, and while it does look helpful in the first glance, it actually isn't a good fit for code. It's very aviation-terminology-focused.
A better guide would be something like Google Developer Style Guide
- quinncom 2mo agoOr, as the Wikipedia Simplified Technical English Wikipedia mentions, use Plain English or Plain Language as non-aerospace alternatives: > The US government's Plain English lacks the strict vocabulary restrictions of the aerospace standard, but represents an attempt at a more general writing standard. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plain_English https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plain_English > Modern corporations and academic organizations hire technical writers already trained to follow a simplified form of English that the layman reader can easily understand, known as plain language (PL). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plain_language https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plain_language And so we've looped back around OP’s “plain English” phrasing.