4 ms·
Rare or not, destroying books is in itself a morally repugnant act. I don't know man, it's not so long ago we used to view nazi book burnings as an archetype of
by andrepd 2mo ago
Rare or not, destroying books is in itself a morally repugnant act. I don't know man, it's not so long ago we used to view nazi book burnings as an archetype of evil. Today companies are offering book-burning-as-a-service and it hardly causes a stir.
Bearded German man was right.
- Gander5739 2mo agoWell, there's a difference between destroying books to erase knowledge and control people, and destroying books because it's cheaper.
- robertoandred 2mo agoEasy claim to make when you’re not responsible for storing those books.
- JodieBenitez 2mo ago> destroying books is in itself a morally repugnant act It's a routine act in any publisher stock management.
- SwtCyber 2mo ago[dead]
- skeledrew 2mo agoIs it destruction or format shift? Technically the books still exist; just that they're now digital. There's no content loss (what I imagine comprises a "book") unless any digitization is then deleted.