> This is not really worse on purpose. They made a product so good no one ever bought it again and they couldn't afford to keep making immortal products. I don

> This is not really worse on purpose. They made a product so good no one ever bought it again and they couldn't afford to keep making immortal products. I don't understand how "their first product was too good, so they had to start making worse ones" isn't "worse on purpose". It seems like a paradigm case of "worse on purpose" to me. What am I missing?