4 ms·

It doesn't really take into account that not all products are meant to be premium. Like it says to avoid Black & Decker because it's "Built to a price point, no

It doesn't really take into account that not all products are meant to be premium. Like it says to avoid Black & Decker because it's "Built to a price point, not a quality standard". Like we know, it's not the 1980s - sometimes you just need a cheap drill to mount a TV and then forget about until you move.

axus 3mo ago
I wouldn't need the site for these situations, just buy what looks good at Lowe's or Target and don't worry if the brand is worse than the 1980s. Wonder how much money "Worse on Purpose" has been offered so far.
jjkaczor 3mo ago
... and this kind of site gives you the ability to do some more research ... Myself, I am of the "buy the cheapest tool" first and see if I use it... If I use it and it works, great - if it breaks or wears out - or I use it regularly and it is "sub-par", then I will replace with something I do more research on. Except - the breakdown of that argument, is sometimes the cheap tool wastes your time and it's "poor quality" actually prevents you from developing the skill and experience of performing that task correctly.
paulddraper 3mo ago
Tools are (can be) cheap. An electric drill from Harbor Freight costs as much as breakfast from Dennys. You going to pass it on to your kids? No. But maybe you don’t need to.
dredmorbius 3mo ago
No, not all products need be premium. But trading off a former reputation for premium quality whilst hollowing out the brand / actual goods ... is a pretty bright flag of red hue. Looking through the list, I'm finding that the classifications and narratives for the cases I'm familiar with largely match my own experience, about 50 of the listed brands. Principle exceptions are Keen and Merrell, both shoemakers. I've watched their products disintegrate before my eyes. Both had had good reputations. Keen, ironically, being my substitute for Teva when that brand went bad in the early aughts. If anything, the rankings are generous. Though I don't see any marked "Approved" I'd disagree with.
chanux 3mo ago
I'd assume we can rent one in this era of renting.. everything.

axus 3mo ago

I wouldn't need the site for these situations, just buy what looks good at Lowe's or Target and don't worry if the brand is worse than the 1980s. Wonder how much money "Worse on Purpose" has been offered so far.

jjkaczor 3mo ago

... and this kind of site gives you the ability to do some more research ... Myself, I am of the "buy the cheapest tool" first and see if I use it... If I use it and it works, great - if it breaks or wears out - or I use it regularly and it is "sub-par", then I will replace with something I do more research on. Except - the breakdown of that argument, is sometimes the cheap tool wastes your time and it's "poor quality" actually prevents you from developing the skill and experience of performing that task correctly.

paulddraper 3mo ago

Tools are (can be) cheap. An electric drill from Harbor Freight costs as much as breakfast from Dennys. You going to pass it on to your kids? No. But maybe you don’t need to.

dredmorbius 3mo ago

No, not all products need be premium. But trading off a former reputation for premium quality whilst hollowing out the brand / actual goods ... is a pretty bright flag of red hue. Looking through the list, I'm finding that the classifications and narratives for the cases I'm familiar with largely match my own experience, about 50 of the listed brands. Principle exceptions are Keen and Merrell, both shoemakers. I've watched their products disintegrate before my eyes. Both had had good reputations. Keen, ironically, being my substitute for Teva when that brand went bad in the early aughts. If anything, the rankings are generous. Though I don't see any marked "Approved" I'd disagree with.

chanux 3mo ago

I'd assume we can rent one in this era of renting.. everything.