> You can't replace the last three copies of an 18th-century botanical text once someone shreds them for training data. And the judge said it's legal. An 18th

> You can't replace the last three copies of an 18th-century botanical text once someone shreds them for training data. And the judge said it's legal. An 18th century book would be out of copyright so why would it be illegal to keep the original and scan it?