4 ms·
Note that border searches of electronic devices are extremely rare overall. There were some statistics from CBP implying a base rate lower than 1 in 10,000 (I t
by schoen 2mo ago
Note that border searches of electronic devices are extremely rare overall. There were some statistics from CBP implying a base rate lower than 1 in 10,000 (I think lower than 1 in 100,000) border crossings.
I do know two people who have experienced them as a result of the government taking a personal interest in them, so it's certainly not impossible. However, it's not a common experience.
I've personally experienced searches of my suitcases about four times in about 100 U.S. border crossings (as a U.S. citizen, but the people performing or directing those searches generally didn't know my citizenship status), and zero electronic device searches.
- shevy-java 2mo agoBut why would that be legal? The device is owned by the individual. No judge signed any warrant search for the device. I can do what I want with my device - that is a basic right of property. Imagine if border guards seize money willy-nilly.
- budsniffer952 2mo agoYou are allowed to refuse access to your device, and they are allowed to refuse entry to the country.
- inigyou 2mo agoMost constitutional rights are suspended within 100 miles of a border or international airport.
- morgan814 2mo agoWhich leaves me wondering - should domestic travel be treated the same as international when it comes to securing your devices?
- inigyou 2mo agoWorse, almost the entire population of the USA lives within 100 miles of a border or international airport.
- owenmarshall 2mo agoBecause I was curious about this exact same question, I did some looking on this last night. Case law on this seemingly requires some nexus to a border. In Almeida-Sanchez v US[0], a Mexican citizen was stopped while driving on an east-west road that was near the border but that didn't connect to the border. The marijuana that was found in his car was excluded because there was no proof he was actually crossing a border, just near it. So I'd expect, under a functioning legal system, a warrant would be required to search your phone if you landed in JFK on a flight from Altoona. [0]: https://www.oyez.org/cases/1972/71-6278 https://www.oyez.org/cases/1972/71-6278
- gradschool 2mo ago> Imagine if border guards seize money willy-nilly. no need to imagine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_forfeiture_in_the_United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_forfeiture_in_the_United...
- jakzurr 2mo ago> Imagine if border guards seize money willy-nilly. This jogged my memory, though I couldn't find the example I was thinking of. But here's an item that is pretty similar: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenaha,_Texas_asset_forfeiture_controversy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenaha,_Texas_asset_forfeiture... Edit: Not on the border, btw. Just people travelling inside US. I guess it was their mistake to carry cash instead of getting a bank check or something.
- epolanski 2mo agoI'm European and I know plenty, albeit the minority of those I know that went to the US, so I wonder how reliable are CBP stats. Maybe my anecdotal experience is influenced by me being in IT, but still.
- account42 2mo agoI bet they are very reliable. Just look at the immigration hall of the average international US airport and you'll quickly realize that it is literally impossible for even a fraction of the people going through there to be physically searched. Of course this applies only to the average visitor and I'm sure you can significantly increase your changes by being the the "right" line of work - but from my experience and the people I know and work with, being in "IT" in general is not enough to get you searched.