5 ms·

It's possible that could be destruction of evidence as well. Why should it matter whose meat sticks type in the decoy pin?

• MetaWhirledPeas 3mo ago
  Because one is a clear intent to mislead while the other has plausible deniability. "It was there in case of robbery."
  • mattstir 3mo ago
    The prosecution would argue that you ought to have warned officers about the duress pin since this wasn't a robbery scenario.
• make3 3mo ago
  It's harder for them to argue you were actively destroying evidence; you could say that you had written the wipe pin there for a legitimate use case like both your wallet and your phone get stolen
  • incompatible 3mo ago
    Makes sense, since you aren't using that pin every day and it would be easy to forget.