3 ms·

Writing a Compiler for Python

92 points by rogercosseboom 18y ago

scott_s 18y ago
The course is taught by Jeremy Siek, who has done interesting research on generic programming and the design of concepts in C++. Take a look at his papers: http://ece-www.colorado.edu/~siek/publications.html http://ece-www.colorado.edu/~siek/publications.html
abless 18y ago
Thanks!
scorpion032 18y ago
I couldnt find any link to enroll, for this distance learning program
- CUViper 18y ago
  There's a link to the CAETE site, which has a big register button. http://caete.colorado.edu/registration-tuition http://caete.colorado.edu/registration-tuition CSCI: http://caete.colorado.edu/coursedb/view-course/310 http://caete.colorado.edu/coursedb/view-course/310 ECEN: http://caete.colorado.edu/coursedb/view-course/309 http://caete.colorado.edu/coursedb/view-course/309 Though the course website says Fall 2008, so you may have to wait to see if it's offered again in Fall 2009...
  - lysium 18y ago
    However, you have to enroll to the university for credits to distance-learn the course. The Professional development course registration (noncredit) unfortunately does not list the course in its schedule of Fall 2008.
scott_s 18y ago
I've already commented, but I feel compelled to comment again after looking at his homework assignments. They could easily be the basis for a practical textbook in compiler design and implementation. For anyone who's never had a class in compilers, but wants to know more about them, Siek's material is a great way to start.
scorpioxy 18y ago
I really wish the videos from lectures like this were widely available. They would be a great resource for self learners along with the course material.
thedob 18y ago
This is a great idea. One problem with the class upon first glance: the grading structure. It's a compilers class, where you'll actually implement a compiler, for only 10% of your overall grade? The rest of the grade is made up by midterm, final, and quizzes. Teachers not putting emphasis on the actual development often leads to students half-assing assignments and not getting the coding done. The compiler implementation is by far the most valuable experience in this class. The final isn't. The grading weight should reflect as much.
- Aleran 18y ago
  I agree. Project courses like this one should not even have a midterm and a final. They only distract from the main goal of the course.
- sigstoat 18y ago
  I actually took that specific course from Professor Siek last semester. (You can find my name on that page.) Doing the homework was the only way to do decently on the quizes, or the exams. Most of the questions on those tests consisted of "write out the code for the $x portion of the compiler". So if you didn't already understand how that bit worked, you weren't going to figure it out in 10 minutes, and get any of the points. The low emphasis on the homework allowed him to have basically no restrictions on students working together, which is rather handy for most folks. And it still required you actually develop an understanding of the content.

The course is taught by Jeremy Siek, who has done interesting research on generic programming and the design of concepts in C++. Take a look at his papers: http://ece-www.colorado.edu/~siek/publications.html http://ece-www.colorado.edu/~siek/publications.html

abless 18y ago

Thanks!

scorpion032 18y ago

I couldnt find any link to enroll, for this distance learning program

CUViper 18y ago
There's a link to the CAETE site, which has a big register button. http://caete.colorado.edu/registration-tuition http://caete.colorado.edu/registration-tuition CSCI: http://caete.colorado.edu/coursedb/view-course/310 http://caete.colorado.edu/coursedb/view-course/310 ECEN: http://caete.colorado.edu/coursedb/view-course/309 http://caete.colorado.edu/coursedb/view-course/309 Though the course website says Fall 2008, so you may have to wait to see if it's offered again in Fall 2009...
- lysium 18y ago
  However, you have to enroll to the university for credits to distance-learn the course. The Professional development course registration (noncredit) unfortunately does not list the course in its schedule of Fall 2008.

scott_s 18y ago

I've already commented, but I feel compelled to comment again after looking at his homework assignments. They could easily be the basis for a practical textbook in compiler design and implementation. For anyone who's never had a class in compilers, but wants to know more about them, Siek's material is a great way to start.

scorpioxy 18y ago

I really wish the videos from lectures like this were widely available. They would be a great resource for self learners along with the course material.

thedob 18y ago

This is a great idea. One problem with the class upon first glance: the grading structure. It's a compilers class, where you'll actually implement a compiler, for only 10% of your overall grade? The rest of the grade is made up by midterm, final, and quizzes. Teachers not putting emphasis on the actual development often leads to students half-assing assignments and not getting the coding done. The compiler implementation is by far the most valuable experience in this class. The final isn't. The grading weight should reflect as much.

Aleran 18y ago
I agree. Project courses like this one should not even have a midterm and a final. They only distract from the main goal of the course.
sigstoat 18y ago
I actually took that specific course from Professor Siek last semester. (You can find my name on that page.) Doing the homework was the only way to do decently on the quizes, or the exams. Most of the questions on those tests consisted of "write out the code for the $x portion of the compiler". So if you didn't already understand how that bit worked, you weren't going to figure it out in 10 minutes, and get any of the points. The low emphasis on the homework allowed him to have basically no restrictions on students working together, which is rather handy for most folks. And it still required you actually develop an understanding of the content.