2 ms·

I suggest an adjusted value taking burn into account. E.g. you use 20% or whatever of the value. Theory: it ain't 0 if you plant a tree and it is not the whole

by hahahaa 3mo ago

I suggest an adjusted value taking burn into account. E.g. you use 20% or whatever of the value. Theory: it ain't 0 if you plant a tree and it is not the whole tree. There has to be a % that represents on average the effectiveness of the plant over 200 years say. This also addresses the tree death issue.

c7b 3mo ago
So 20% of the trees get planted later or maybe never? How is that better?
- hahahaa 3mo ago
  If you want a credit you need to plant 5x the trees under this system.
  - c7b 3mo ago
    Ok. But what about just making the credits 5x more expensive without requiring monstrous bookkeeping of tree populations and their associated credits over centuries?