4 ms·
Malicious compliance. You do not need a cookie to "store" the fact you have rejected them. They can simply assume you have rejected them from the lack of cookie
by Phemist 2mo ago
Malicious compliance. You do not need a cookie to "store" the fact you have rejected them. They can simply assume you have rejected them from the lack of cookies. They can store a cookie once you (have gone out of your way to) accept them.
- frollogaston 2mo agoLack of cookies could mean you never visited the site before.
- Phemist 2mo agoSafe to assume I reject things on my first visit as well