2 ms·
Usually the argument is that because a reputable news agency with a history of high quality journalism made once a mistake, it's better to listen to some angry
by happosai 2mo ago
Usually the argument is that because a reputable news agency with a history of high quality journalism made once a mistake, it's better to listen to some angry podcaster with a history inviting cooky nutcase, or sketchy Twitter account with history of boosting fake news as jokes.
- ekianjo 2mo agono the pattern is constantly having the same blindspot. like newscaster pushing for "safe and effective" bs completely ignoring side effects