2 ms·
That's factually false. US CSIS data says attacks by non-Islamists account for 85% of total attacks, while attacks by Islamists is just 15%. In Europe, Europo
by khaledh 2mo ago
That's factually false.
US CSIS data says attacks by non-Islamists account for 85% of total attacks, while attacks by Islamists is just 15%.
In Europe, Europol TE-SAT data says it's 59% by non-Islamists vs. 41% by Islamists.
Also, I'm not justifying this attack. I'm pointing out the double-standards.
- GenerocUsername 2mo agoNow do per capita and see that their rate of terror is 10x what it should be. (And that's before readjusting for the undercategorized events being purposefully NOT counted for cultural sympethies)
- x3ro 2mo agoThere is an additional aspect to these statistics. Eg a guy set fire to a house last year in Germany, killing four people of turkish descent. They found plenty of nazi paraphernalia in his house, but it was concluded that there was no “right-wing extremist motivation”. So there is a big question of skewed statistics underpinning all of these discussions.
- throwawaypath 2mo ago>US CSIS data says attacks by non-Islamists account for 85% of total attacks, while attacks by Islamists is just 15%. "What is per capita?"
- indiangenz 2mo ago[dead]
- inigyou 2mo agoYou think Germany should send all its Muslims to re-education camps?