3 ms·
theres just some serious serious challenges here i dont think any of them are impossible to overcome but it would span so many more years and so much more fundi
by trueno 3mo ago
theres just some serious serious challenges here i dont think any of them are impossible to overcome but it would span so many more years and so much more funding to get thru. fuselage pressurization which they claim to have worked around (sus) is one of the spookiest imo.
traditional looking commercial jets, their designs, their manufacturing processes, their innovations (yes boeing/airbus do innovate and have for a long time even though it doesnt seem that way) have all been shaped heavily by human blood. to some degree a radical new design almost guarantees more deaths at a commercial level there's really no shortcutting this without it.
dont get me wrong im super open to the possibility that something like this is possible itd be better for the whole world, but there's no way we get there without re-experiencing some hard lessons if we want to push it pash some sort of proverbial finish line
- margalabargala 3mo agoIf some letters were capitalized it would be easier to read but without this gets downvoted as wordsalad. Almost illegible. Punctuation exists for a reason.
- trueno 3mo agothe misery it takes to make these types of comments lmao. behold lifes hidden fruits of simply scrolling past something that makes you irritable
- margalabargala 3mo agoConsider dropping spaces too. It'll make your comments even more Unique and Quirky! And it won't impact readability in a way you care about!
- trueno 3mo agoyou ok man
- margalabargala 3mo agoProbably not. Is anyone? Look at this world we live in. Billionaires are living it up and climate change is wrecking winter and here we are in the mud, someone like you can't even afford a simple shift key. It's all so crushing.
- trueno 3mo agowtf im being poor shamed for lack of caps by the rss feed bourgeois
- ryanjshaw 3mo ago> have all been shaped heavily by human blood This assumes the lessons were specific to the body type and aren’t generalizable?
- imoverclocked 3mo agoEven small changes to time tested designs provide significant risk. A completely new body style will inevitably provide completely new failure modes. Pressurizing a tube vs pressurizing a pancake (or flattened sphere, or some other easy approximation) will have very different mechanical loading characteristics. Turbulence (differences in air speed/pressure) across a large flat-ish surface that also has a signifiant pressure differential will also prove challenging to design for and scale up. Aerospace is a very high dimensional design process. Doing anything different puts you into unknown territory real fast.