4 ms·
Does it really look more favorable? My understanding was that such far future returns had minimal Net Present Value
by s1artibartfast 3mo ago
Does it really look more favorable? My understanding was that such far future returns had minimal Net Present Value
- hansvm 3mo agoNet Present Value isn't quite the right thing to look at. Inflation-adjusted energy prices have been rising over time, so the thing these batteries are projected to deliver (fixed impact on that electricity grid) increases in value over time even after the NPV discount. The more important component is the "risk-adjusted" NPV, which may or may not make tech like this effectively worthless.
- s1artibartfast 3mo agowhy dont you think revenue from energy prices isnt baked into the NPV? The time discout is applied, on top of whatever the revenue model is.
- tim333 3mo agoI saw an interview with I think the CATL ceo and he was saying it's quite a headache ensuring the batteries last that long. Grid storage companies want 25 or 30 year guarantees. It sounds like sodium may have the advantage there.