3 ms·
That's false. It's evidence, but it isn't conclusive. Someone thought that the law suit was worth filing, and that could be because the law suit has a chance of
by john01dav 2mo ago
That's false. It's evidence, but it isn't conclusive. Someone thought that the law suit was worth filing, and that could be because the law suit has a chance of succeeding. It could also be some other reason, and it could also fail even if completely good faith -- this is why the evidence is non-conclusive.
- cromka 2mo agoBy your logic, counter-lawsuits and especially the SLAPP suits are also evidence.
- fragmede 2mo agoStill, RAM manufacturers have a long history of price fixing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DRAM_industry_price_fixing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DRAM_industry_price_fixing
- Klonoar 2mo ago> Someone thought that the law suit was worth filing No, someone thought that they could win a lawsuit. We live in a highly litigious society. This happens all the time. It's not _evidence_, it's _suspicion_, and it's asking it to be reviewed in a court of law.