4 ms·
AFR articles never seem to deny my access, it may simply be due to flushing cookies that evidence prior visits. That aside, it's a three month old article and
by defrost 3mo ago
AFR articles never seem to deny my access, it may simply be due to flushing cookies that evidence prior visits.
That aside, it's a three month old article and archived back when first published: https://archive.md/cSxkZ https://archive.md/cSxkZ
and yes, it's a litany of Meta, Snapchat, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok and YouTube declarations of acknowledgement of the recent Australian laws, statements of the challenges faced, and an absence of evidence of any substantial effort being made (relatively small numbers of accounts banned, a few hundred thousand versus millions remaining).
- anenefan 3mo agoWow that's interesting you don't have a problem loading afr. Maybe it's my ISP. Thanks for the link - it was that news cycle from end of March. [1] [2] Yes Big Tech was always going to say it wasn't going to work. However if some kids are still there and nothing alarming is making the news, then that's ok too. However if there's a hint there's still harm being done ... fines make big money for govt and lawyers. [1] https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/australia-investigating-tech-giants-over-teen-social-media-ban-breaches/5snwlrhak https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/australia-investigating-... [2] https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03-31/five-social-media-platforms-under-investigation-under-16s-ban/106513690 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03-31/five-social-media-pla... * "That isn't the law failing, that isn't Australian parents or Australian kids not complying, that is big tech taking the piss, to be honest," Ms Wells said.*