4 ms·
... and It is ok. I bought 16TB disk because I needed that much storage. If I were using, say, only 10TB, I would be wasting 6TB. I can expand my LVM as much
by notorandit 2mo ago
... and It is ok.
I bought 16TB disk because I needed that much storage.
If I were using, say, only 10TB, I would be wasting 6TB.
I can expand my LVM as much as I can. But I definitely want my disk to be full. Same goes for my RAM.
And I want my CPU ide time to stay as close as possible to 0% and my load average as close as possible to my no. of CPUs.
Anything else would mean oversizing and overspending.
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- rcxdude 2mo agoSlack has value, though. Your full disk is likely to be very fragmented, making file access slow. A CPU running a full throttle cannot deal with spikes in demand. full RAM means less cache space available. And these issues get asymptotically worse as you approach 100% utilization (which can have catastrophic effects in organizations which are too heavily optimized for high utilization).
- cxr 2mo agoSomehow I get the sense that you don't shoot for a balance of $0 in your bank account.
- notorandit 2mo agoIf my plans is to have it all invested (or spent), then yes it is ok.
- cxr 2mo agoSomehow I get the sense that you don't shoot for a balance of $0 in your bank account.