3 ms·
btw what's the current state of mesh wifi? seems like after November or January 2029 might need it since administration now has a kill-switch so why wouldn't t
by ck2 3mo ago
btw what's the current state of mesh wifi?
seems like after November or January 2029 might need it since administration now has a kill-switch so why wouldn't they use it
- inigyou 3mo agoMesh networks don't scale beyond a few thousand nodes if the nodes move frequently. Nobody has found a way to make that work. You can push another order of magnitude if you give up on decentralisation.
- iamnothere 3mo ago“Always connected” meshes don’t scale, but fragmented meshes that use store-and-forward for some data are workable. I’d like to see someone do this with Nostr. The main issue is that you’d have to limit the size of data in transit, so rich media is probably not realistic. Think FIDO protocol rather than the always-on internet we’re accustomed to. A mesh of meshes may also be possible in theory.
- ck2 3mo agoah doesn't ham-radio packet system do something like that, I only vaguely remember but someone would have to build it into a major 3rd party firmware like openwrt to get wide adoption
- tancop 3mo agothe other way is using a hybrid mesh/tree system where volunteers or paid services transfer non local traffic over static links. aka the internet we have now but with a fallback layer.