3 ms·
None of your three examples provide any evidence of hazmat crews forcibly taking away infected people. In fact, your links have absolutely nothing to do with an
by no_carrier 2mo ago
None of your three examples provide any evidence of hazmat crews forcibly taking away infected people. In fact, your links have absolutely nothing to do with anything at all. It's reasonable to assume that police would arrest people breaching curfew orders.
Under no circumstances was anyone in Australia forcibly removed by people in hazmat suits.
- aand16 2mo agoCircumstances: > The man had been staying at the Intercontinental, in the centre of Perth, until yesterday afternoon before three officers, dressed in Hazmat suits removed him from his room. https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/australia/illegal-immigrant-removed-from-quarantine-hotel-by-officers-in-hazmat-suits/news-story/75f1b8188feee6ae7cdbf4bfbe96e00e https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/australia/illegal-... Mirror: http://archive.today/ekWBs http://archive.today/ekWBs
- no_carrier 2mo agoThat's someone getting deported and has nothing to do with the claims that people were being forcibly removed into quarantine zones. This just didn't happen.
- perpetuallunch 2mo agoYour argument seems to boil down to a No True Hazmat Suit fallacy. Where if the uniform worn isn’t quite right, and the location isn’t quite the same, and the presence or absence of one arbitrary infectious agent doesn’t match the criteria, then Everything Is Okay™.