2 ms·
You are correct, the frameworks around it have improved. In that regard, my assessment is unfair: I only judge the underlying technology and what is sold by the
by rf15 3mo ago
You are correct, the frameworks around it have improved. In that regard, my assessment is unfair: I only judge the underlying technology and what is sold by the sota providers, with the premise of what it's like when you start fresh. You can achieve a lot by coding around the issues, but that's kinda against the point of 'AI', is it?
- wahnfrieden 3mo agoNo, its capabilities with a harness are what we are interested in. Your assessment is only relevant to benchmarking, not practical value.
- Barbing 3mo agoorwin‘s response in a cousin comment helped me see your original valid point on harnessless LLMs! >You can achieve a lot by coding around the issues, but that's kinda against the point of 'AI', is it? Will think on that a bit more.