3 ms·
I'm not so sure about that. I just worked on a website that contained some video (for a children's show TV format), and we did some calculations on what hosting
by PanMan 14y ago
I'm not so sure about that. I just worked on a website that contained some video (for a children's show TV format), and we did some calculations on what hosting the video would cost.
With 50 Mb/video, you can do 20 video's for 1 Gb of traffic. Which, at AWS cost 12 cents. Let's say you'd pay half that at a cheaper CDN, 6 cents. You would, just for transporting the video, need to make 6/20=0.3 cents/page. That's $3 CPM, which seems high. And this is only for transporting the video, not the other infrastructure needed. Not so sure that's a winning business-model.
To be fair, we also looked into setting up our own servers, some places have a few TB traffic with a $50 VPS, but than you need a lot more sysadmin work.
- true_religion 14y agoAWS is the most expensive "CDN" that I've ever seen in my life. Their prices rival Akamai and their service certainly doesn't. With volume, you can get CDN pricing to 1 cent/page. The adult market, if nothing else, is a place where even mid-range sites can have massive volume and cut special deals.
- rdl 14y agoAkamai also doesn't service porn at all. (S)limelight seems to be what a lot of sites use.