4 ms·
> This led to a coup, which resulted in the current Iranian government. I mean, you're passing over the violent revolution from socialists and Islamists.
by strictnein 3mo ago
> This led to a coup, which resulted in the current Iranian government.
I mean, you're passing over the violent revolution from socialists and Islamists.
- pbiggar 3mo agoAmerica had a violent revolution. So did practically every other country. Are violent revolutions de facto bad?
- Der_Einzige 3mo agoYes. We had no good justification for war against the crown circa the American revolutionary war. The crown spent a lot of money defending us vs the French in the French and Indian war and were totally justified in levying the extremely low taxes that they did on the colonists. We should be part of Canada right now
- frollogaston 3mo agoMaybe defending and taxing the colonies should've been the colonies' decision, not England's. Even if England gave them a favorable deal that they then broke, England's mistake then. Also, I only care about what outcome is better for us in the long run. Being part of UK or Canada wouldn't have been better. Though many colonies' independence movements have led to disaster.
- strictnein 3mo agoHuh? I'm just pointing out that their supposed timeline of events missed a rather notable one. Also, yes, your insight that not all revolutions are equal is correct. The US "revolution" (really more of a war for independence) was a net positive. The Iranian Revolution (which truly was a revolution) was a net negative.