4 ms·
Feels like a No True Scotsman fallacy.
by jubilanti 3mo ago
Feels like a No True Scotsman fallacy.
- 1718627440 3mo agoHow so? The property Scotsman is existing a priori and then a causality to behaviour is assumed. But here the term is defined by behaviour.
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]
- pdpi 3mo agoThere's multiple ways to program using LLMs, so using different words for different styles is a useful distinction. Of course, you absolutely can build a No True Scotsman argument on top of that distinction, but I don't think that's what GP was doing.
- danlitt 3mo agoBy that logic every appeal to the truth is a No True Scotsman fallacy.