3 ms·
Well yes, it is equivalent. And they looked more and more carefully, and never found tiny clockwork gears, so that was not supported by the evidence. What they
by azakai 14y ago
Well yes, it is equivalent. And they looked more and more carefully, and never found tiny clockwork gears, so that was not supported by the evidence.
What they did find were abstract, mechanical laws of physics.
- freshhawk 14y agoA more apt analogy would have been testing for a specific number of gears with a specific number of teeth in a specific configuration. Choosing very specific hypotheses purely based on your ability to falsify it and no other supporting theory or evidence seems like a low reward strategy. I'm certainly not trying to argue against pure research in any way.