4 ms·
> Codeberg was actively positioned as an indie almost drop-in Github alternative What on earth are you talking about? No one, no less Codeberg themselves, woul
by embedding-shape 3mo ago
> Codeberg was actively positioned as an indie almost drop-in Github alternative
What on earth are you talking about? No one, no less Codeberg themselves, would make up such fictitious comparison.
The terms and conditions second point is "Allowed Content & Usage", and has been for a good 4 years, no one who's part of the organization would say it's a "drop-in GitHub alternative". It's not a "anything goes" git host either.
- bhelkey 3mo ago>> Codeberg was actively positioned as an indie almost drop-in Github alternative > What on earth are you talking about? No one, no less Codeberg themselves, would make up such fictitious comparison. Codeberg's getting started documentation has the line, "Codeberg is not a for-profit corporation but an open community of free software enthusiasts providing a humane, non-commercial and privacy-friendly alternative to commercial services such as GitHub." [1] [1] https://docs.codeberg.org/getting-started/what-is-codeberg/ https://docs.codeberg.org/getting-started/what-is-codeberg/
- simoncion 3mo agoNothing in that quote suggests that it's an "almost drop-in" replacement for Github. As an illustrative example: Proton is an alternative to Microsoft Windows, but it is not a drop-in replacement.