3 ms·
It's a matter of philosophy; would you rather have multiple small apps that do only one job or one "super app" that does it all? Ironically, starting from the
by behnamoh 3mo ago
It's a matter of philosophy; would you rather have multiple small apps that do only one job or one "super app" that does it all?
Ironically, starting from the former, I've now turned my tmux into the latter with so many utility apps integrated into it. But now I can see the benefits of each approach. Maintaining "super apps" is more challenging due to the coupling of so many pieces to each other.
- dietr1ch 3mo agoAnd building a consistent good experience from isolated tools is even harder. The problem is just hard and I think good criteria with the super app approach is the way to go. I really like Spacemacs. It's discoverable, extendable, quite consistent.
- behnamoh 3mo ago> And building a consistent good experience from isolated tools is even harder. Yes, I agree, which is why my tmux slowly devours my numerous small utility apps into itself! I haven't tried Spacemacs yet, too Vim-pilled at the moment..
- BeetleB 3mo ago> I haven't tried Spacemacs yet, too Vim-pilled at the moment.. You do know that Spacemacs defaults to Vim bindings, right?
- kleiba2 3mo agoIf the "super app" is modular - like Emacs is - you basically get the best of both worlds.