2 ms·
I have no clue what you're talking about tbh. I can use a lossy compression algorithm that is definitionally holding less information than the original while st
by insanitybit 3mo ago
I have no clue what you're talking about tbh. I can use a lossy compression algorithm that is definitionally holding less information than the original while still be subject to the copyright of the original. This is just obviously true, converting a PNG to a JPEG does not invalidate the copyright on the PNG. You can also produce an imagine using a lossy compression algorithm that is not subject to the copyright of the original, I haven't said that that's not true.
Regardless, the argument that LLM output is or is not subject to copyright based on information theory is entirely defeated by what I've said.
- satvikpendem 3mo agoRead their example again if you have no idea what they're talking about. Nothing you said defeats the fact that LLMs do not do compression.
- insanitybit 3mo agoNothing about entropy is related to copyright.
- flir 3mo ago> I have no clue what you're talking about tbh. Point an LLM at the conversation and ask it to ELI5 the competing arguments.
- satvikpendem 3mo agoIndeed, not sure how this person above can't comprehend any competing arguments and seem to say they "don't understand" over and over again.
- insanitybit 3mo agoWhy? I'm very obviously right. Entropy has nothing to do with copyright. Any LLM will answer the same.