4 ms·

ChatGPT 5.5 and Sol 5.6, Fable are good. I haven't really tested Opus 4.8, but 4.7 wasn't nearly as good as ChatGPT 5.5.

• somenameforme 3mo ago
  Interesting! The reason I asked is I've had poor results with Fable and 3d stuff. Its spatial awareness seems poor - doing things like rotating left and then right back, and then pitching nonsensically, just to try to capture a segment of a scene for a verification pass. And its placement often results in clipping, misrotations, and so on. It could well be that the exact domain matters more than the bigger picture concepts, like 3d. One of the ever fewer reminders that this tech is still just fundamentally a token prediction algorithm.
  • 21asdffdsa12 3mo ago
    The failure seems to be that a scene is inherently hierarchical with a graph with offset, rotation, scale and a name - and this seems to be transferred back poorely fro example during 3d generation.
  • nl 3mo ago
    That's interesting. I only did a couple of attempts with Fable and it seemed fine. Mostly I have been using GPT 5.5 and now 5.6 That is notable because I do almost exclusively use Claude for coding.