I like how each bar has paths whose widths add up to the length of the bar (100%), but I don't like the circular approach to the visualization. It seems to impl

I like how each bar has paths whose widths add up to the length of the bar (100%), but I don't like the circular approach to the visualization. It seems to imply that each arc on the circle is the same "type" as everything else, while in reality each subject of the agglomeration will have one major and one career (roughly speaking). Wouldn't it make more sense to divide it into two linear segments, whose sub-segments map to each other? That clarifies the distinction, and it'd make it clearer that, e.g., majors can't map to majors.