3 ms·
What did they nerf
by dbbk 3mo ago
What did they nerf
- unsungNovelty 3mo agoPWA for starters? They are not interested in Indie devs anyways. Might as well let us use PWA no?
- dbbk 3mo agoHow
- phoghed 3mo agoSafari arguably has better PWA support than Firefox last time I checked.
- nozzlegear 3mo agoPWAs enjoy excellent support in Safari: https://pwascore.com https://pwascore.com
- bearjaws 3mo agoApple: adblocking, PWA being put in a odd spot, surely to be followed by a post "nobody was using it" before being removed, if they mention it at all. Google: ad blocking
- dbbk 3mo agoAd blocking isn't nerfed
- arijun 3mo agoIt is when compared to Firefox. Safari and now Google claim that it's for security, as the newer interfaces expose way less attack surface for malicious add-ons. I think that it's true that it does improve security, although I'm not sure that I believe Google when they say they're not doing it to stop people from blocking their main revenue source.
- whstl 3mo agoAt least the blocker I use, uBlock Lite, isn't nerfed. It doesn't have Manifest v3-ish limitations, and can do dynamic blocking, injection, etc.
- eipi10_hn 3mo agouBO Lite is exactly MV3, it has most of MV3 limitations plus its own limitations comparing to Chromium. Safari just auto converts MV3 codes to Safari's own blocking engines.
- arijun 3mo agoIt cannot do dynamic filtering [1]. Another big one I forgot about is no CNAME uncloaking. Don't get me wrong, uBOL is still a great add on, it's just not possible to do everything you could with the manifest v2 version. [1] https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home/wiki/Frequently-asked-questions-(FAQ)#filtering-capabilities-which-cant-be-ported-to-mv3 https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home/wiki/Frequently-as...
- EPWN3D 3mo agoNothing. This is just FUD.