3 ms·
He was a very readable columnist for PC Mag among other places. He was also more focused on being interesting and at least a bit provocative than being correct.
by ghaff 3mo ago
He was a very readable columnist for PC Mag among other places. He was also more focused on being interesting and at least a bit provocative than being correct.
>He was a hilarious curmudgeon.
Agreed.
- duzer65657 3mo ago>> He was also more focused on being interesting and at least a bit provocative than being correct. So exactly like everyone today, but also interesting?
- smackeyacky 3mo agoHe set the style of being confidently incorrect. At least he was entertaining.
- smoyer 3mo agoHe would make a great AI!
- ghaff 3mo agoProbably. With some exceptions, he wasn't flat out wrong. But he did push the boundaries from time to time.