3 ms·
If you look at the raster image ChatGPT generated, that is fine. It is just this example (and other simple SVG icons I have asked for) result in pretty bad SVGs
by apwheele 3mo ago
If you look at the raster image ChatGPT generated, that is fine. It is just this example (and other simple SVG icons I have asked for) result in pretty bad SVGs. It just makes me highly suspicious that the LLMs are learning shape primitives and extrapolating to new shapes, vs just having a big dictionary of prior examples and stitching them together.
- robocat 3mo agoDon't judge the dog's technique. The miracle is that it's dancing. I would guess most programmers struggle to create SVG icons - I don't find it easy. The average person even more so. Are we best to assume an LLM is a blind programmer? Any HN comments from blind programmers tasked with creating SVG icons? Only relevant comment I could find from ctoth was about accessibility: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7185771 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7185771 Projecting how you think onto what the LLM is doing or should be doing, is probably a mistake on your part. I recently spent a little time trying to understand exactly why Gemini was misexplaining $X. $X = {why the generated LaTeX visually didn't match what it was asked to do}. It was enlightening.