3 ms·
Good for you. Now, shall we discuss the ecological and commercial cost of that?
by lproven 3mo ago
Good for you.
Now, shall we discuss the ecological and commercial cost of that?
- Kim_Bruning 3mo agoSo, I notice a https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop , followed by https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Moving_the_goalposts https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Moving_the_goalposts Let's just say I'm skeptical of your skepticism ;-)
- lproven 3mo agoNo, it is categorically not a Gish gallop when I post single-line responses at an interval of days. You are attempting to deflect the argument based on irrelevant side-claims. I'm sure there's a term for that, but I can't be bothered to look it up before my morning cup of tea is done.
- Kim_Bruning 3mo agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48991040 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48991040 gish gallop https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49012641 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49012641 moving of goalposts once we started moving to empirical territory. And I'll get back to getting my units to pass. Have a nice morning!