3 ms·
Because that's legally the case? I don't understand the question. Using a lossy compression algorithm on an image does not remove its copyright protection.
by insanitybit 3mo ago
Because that's legally the case? I don't understand the question. Using a lossy compression algorithm on an image does not remove its copyright protection.
- satvikpendem 3mo agoTaking in an image then creating something new based on the ideas of that image is legally permissible, if you mean that you think AI training produces only derivative works.
- insanitybit 3mo agoI am not sure what you're trying to say. Compressing an image is creating a derived work, it is still subject to the copyright of the original.
- satvikpendem 3mo agoWhat AI is doing is not analogous to compression so even if you think they are they same, it legally and technically speaking is not subject to the copyright of the original.
- insanitybit 3mo agoAre you missing the comment that I'd responded to? > Information entropy. The amount of data an LLM ingests cannot be compressed to the size of the weights even at maximum theoretical compression.
- satvikpendem 3mo agoI wrote that comment. As I said, an LLM's weights are less than the size of theoretical compression, therefore what LLM training is doing is not compression at all.
- insanitybit 3mo agoI can't believe I have to say this again? Information theory is completely irrelevant to copyright.
- satvikpendem 3mo agoAt this point I believe you are willfully misunderstanding the argument, based on your other comments saying you don't understand, repeatedly, so I can't believe you have to say it again either.
- insanitybit 3mo agok