4 ms·
Came here to flag the same beat. It's wild to me Terrance Tao has to pay to talk to chatgpt, you would think it would be the other way around!
by taylorfinley 3mo ago
Came here to flag the same beat. It's wild to me Terrance Tao has to pay to talk to chatgpt, you would think it would be the other way around!
- Freedom2 3mo agoHow would you envision ChatGPT paying Terrence?
- LearnYouALisp 3mo ago"I have some tokens." "What am I going to do with these?" "Try to trade them up for a Volkswagen?"
- missedthecue 3mo agoOpenAI giving him a fancy schmancy title to advocate for their product, such as in the way he is inadvertantly doing here.
- paxys 3mo agoHe doesn’t seem the kind who would sell his credibility for a few bucks.
- jephs 3mo agoOpenAI hiring him as a consultant, obviously, which may well be the case.
- Freedom2 3mo agoIt's not so obvious. Taking my parent comment literally (as he said "the other way around"), one can assume that ChatGPT the platform itself would pay Terrence, rather than OpenAI.
- gowld 3mo ago"Activating Pro" doesn't mean "paying". It means selecting a slower/smarter model.
- metanonsense 3mo agoYeah. I also only use pro in very specific situations. Not (just) because it's slow, but if the question is too simple or vague, pro responses are sometimes overfitting to the noise in my question. Until there is lots of context and the basics are laid out, high or xhigh somehow work better. Pro gives you the last 10%.